In the readings regarding the varying opinions and evidence regarding the existence of unidentified flying objects, it was easy to form or strengthen our personal belief and stance regarding this topic. In the first article “Scientific Study of Unidentified Flying Objects” by Condon, the author argues that technology still needs improvement so that we can fully explain and stand behind the belief about these UFOs. If there is a good idea about their existence, there should be credible information to support whatever stance one takes. He also adds that since this is the case, UFO reports should not be publicized. Moreover, Hynek, the author of “The UFO Experience: A Scientific Inquiry,” talks about this experience is not given much attention by the authorities, and because of this neglect, it is not looked at closely or systematically. Since it has never been fully clarified by the scientists, they can never fully execute proper data collection. Hynek suggests that a good way to approach this is to start from scratch and start gathering and processing data. Open communication should also be kept among the countries since this phenomenon is familiar worldwide. Lastly, in the article “Physical Evidence and Unidentified Flying Objects” by Paynter, the writer believes that unless there is physical evidence about the existence of UFOs. I personally stand behind Paynter’s argument. The human mind is full of imaginations and it is not difficult to make a story more interesting or make assumptions about certain issues. Unless an argument is a hundred percent supported, it is going to be difficult for me to believe this or any argument for this matter. Nothing is going to make this topic more credible but the presence of physical evidence.
No comments:
Post a Comment